His Belgian accent fades at times but still, he puts in an another exceptional performance. Hugh does an outstanding job, once again. What about Hugh Fraser’s performance did you like? Sorry, but I think that's a silly-ass question. Now who are we to suggest changes to an Agatha Christie story? I ask you. How would you have changed the story to make it more enjoyable? It was different, certainly, but still an enjoyable listen. Since Agatha returns to her previous Poirot style after this one, we can safely assume her experiment was something less than successful and I'll be glad to get back to a more traditional Poirot novel with the next one, but this one is still a hoot.Re: what I liked the least, I can't think of anything that I didn't particularly like. The plot twists in this book are of a different, more fantastic variety and more than once I LOL'd at some of the wildly fortunate developments, but that just made it more fun.
I think here, she attempted to make him more of a James Bond character, in an attempt to at least shake things up and perhaps focus more on Hastings.
It seems to me I once read that she really detested Poirot as a character and wanted to quit writing his stories, but fans insisted. I liked the departure from Christie's standard format for this Hercule Poirot adventure. What did you like best about The Big Four? What did you like least?
0 kommentar(er)
